Vagina Power

I did not have to look far to find a powerful vagina. One was within arm’s reach. I am referring, of course, to the sheela-na-gig maquette pictured above, purchased for me by a lady historian during her vacation in Ireland, and currently resting on my desktop. It radiates vulva energy towards me all day. Ah, how I bask in its healing rays.

Like other so-called sheela-na-gigs, this one gleefully exposes her juicy bits to viewers. Similar images of female figures gesturing towards, rubbing, or opening their exaggerated genitals were carved on Irish and English churches and castles during the Late Middle Ages. But why? That is a burning question, with many possible answers. Are these gals fertility goddesses or, on the contrary, do they provide warnings against female lust? The latter interpretation seems unlikely, for the grinning figures actively portray masturbation as one hell of a good time. The idea that they ward off evil is more convincing to me because many sheela-na-gigs are located on building exteriors, near windows or doorways. My other favourite explanation of these intriguing works of art is that they offer taunts to the Irish recently subjugated by Anglo-Norman conquest. Basically, a lifted skirt means “Hey loser, get a load of this!” Such genital mockery can occur today, though usually in dance clubs rather than places of worship.

Are there any comparable images of powerful vaginas in current popular culture? I am not talking about fake porn diddle, where women wearing silk stockings lick their own nipples while straddling full-length mirrors. [Aside for straight/bi boys wanting a dose of reality: think partially lowered jammy pants followed by a quick wash up. Not the picture you had in mind? Tough shit.] After wracking my brain and consulting my facebook fans, the answer to my vulva query was sadly limited, involving delicate flowers, ridged ceramics, and clinical visions that reminded me to book my next pap smear.

Georgia O’Keeffe, Black Iris, 1926. Painted by a lady who loved lady parts.

Judy Chicago’s The Dinner Party, 1973-79, portrays Virginia Woolf’s vagina as an artichoke salad.

Gustave Courbet, The Origin of the World, 1866. I like the title, and the fleshliness of this image, but find the whole thing a little headlessly gynecological.

You may have noticed that the previous images are neither new nor well known. It is practically impossible to find more recent pictures of engorged and pulsing vulvas that could be considered empowering for women. In fact, exposed lady nuts are either linked with immanent danger for men—think Sharon Stone’s crossed and uncrossed legs in the film Basic Instinct—or with desperate attention-seeking behaviour—think Britney Spears’ nude hoo hoo as she clumsily exits a car, if you must.

Maybe Luce Irigaray was right. In her early work, namely Speculum of the Other Woman (1974) and This Sex Which is Not One (1977), the French feminist rejected genital ocularcentrism, that is, an approach to sexuality that emphasizes looking over such other senses as touch. An unwarranted emphasis on vision has, after all, privileged the penis/phallus, placing it at the centre of the symbolic order. An interest in looking and singularity tends to favour man-parts, leaving the lady side of things—all tucked away, neat and tidy—contrastingly associated with absence and lack. Irigaray argues that the vulva offers “two lips in continunous contact,” describing a sexuality that is always already in touch with itself, and always active, despite appearances to the contrary. The penis/phallus, on the other hand, is far less independent, requiring the mediation of a hand, orifice, or other substance to find its pleasure.

So my focus on vision in this post was misguided and bound to fail. Mea culpa.

Hey defensive guys: Irigaray is not saying that lady bits are superior to man bits per se. Yet she does suggest that the entire gal package is more self-sufficient, omnipresent, and actively adaptable than your lackluster junk. So there. In my current state, seated in my office on a Saturday night, wearing warm jammy pants [no offense to a Fitbabe fan called Jammy], I tend to agree. Luce, I salute you, but not with the usual thumbs up. Instead, I show my appreciation with a thumb that is not one, a thumb that touches itself, folding in to celebrate multiplicity. I proudly make a gesture long known in the Mediterranean world as la figa.

In your face with my giant girl fig.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , by feministfiguregirl. Bookmark the permalink.

About feministfiguregirl

I am a 50-year-old professor named Lianne McTavish who receives as much satisfaction from working out at the gym as from publishing my academic research. I decided to combine my two primary identities (scholar/gym rat) to create "Feminist Figure Girl," a fictional character who both analyzes and participates in bodybuilding. I competed in my first figure show in June of 2011, and then wrote a book inspired by the process, published by SUNY Press in February 2015. In this blog I will write about and consider my ongoing research on the body, while regularly making fun of myself. I recommend that you start reading my first post from August 2010 (available on the home page), instead of backwards from the most recent one, in order to get the full FFG effect.

5 thoughts on “Vagina Power

  1. And that’s what Carolee Schneeman said the other night, why she inserted her body into her paintings, because touch was more important than vision.

  2. Hey defensive guys: Irigaray is not saying that lady bits are superior to man bits per se.

    So what if she is? I mean, men have been saying that theirs are for centuries and enforcing it. I think we can take a little pushback.

    Maybe I’m not defensive enough.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s